About

Editorial policy

An editorial policy is not a declaration of good faith but a list of rules, every one of which can be checked against the site itself. Here is how we handle numbers and disputed claims, what we do not write as a matter of principle and what we do with an error once found.

Six rules for handling numbers

01Not one number without a source or a formula

A firm's rule comes with a reference and a date. A market estimate comes with its author named. A calculation comes with the formula in the text alongside. A number lacking one of the three does not get published.

verifiable
02A model example is marked as a model

If the numbers were chosen for illustration, that is said outright. The reader must be able to tell “this is how it is at FTMO” from “this is how it is in our example”.

distinguishable
03An assumption is named rather than passed over

Every calculation has a section on what it does not account for, and which way that shifts the result.

in the open
04An estimate is not presented as a fact

A challenge pass rate of 5–10% is an aggregators' estimate, not firms' data. The words “by estimates” stand next to the number rather than in a footnote.

with attribution
05Anything disputed is given from both sides

The My Forex Funds case — the CFTC suit and its dismissal with costs awarded against the CFTC itself. The claim that “forex props do not exist” — with its author named and checked against the facts.

in full
06The query does not dictate the conclusion

A page starts from a search query, but the answer to it is not bent to what the person wants to hear. If the right answer is “this is not worth doing”, that is what is written, even when the query is phrased as “how to do it”.

checkable in the text

What we do not write as a matter of principle

Four prohibitions, and they outrank convenience. Each can be checked by searching the site.

we do not writePromises of returnsNo earnings forecasts and no “how much can be made in a month”. Income depends on your statistics, and any promise would be a lie about something we do not know.
we do not writeRankings and “best” firmsThe order in such lists reflects affiliate arrangements, and compatibility with a strategy is personal. There will be a list of terms; there will be no ranking.
we do not writeThird-party statistics without a sourceAny number about the market is presented with its author named and with a note that it is an estimate rather than firms' data.
we do not giveLegal and tax adviceWe are not lawyers or tax advisers. On the relevant pages we lay out what the question consists of and what to ask a professional, but we are not answerable for it.

What we do with an error

Errors in calculations happen, and the rule here is simple: the cause is corrected, not the symptom. If a number on a page has diverged from the calculator, what gets corrected is not the number but what produced it — otherwise the divergence comes back.

The order is this. The error is reproduced: we have to see it ourselves rather than take it on trust. Then the cause is found — in the formula, in an assumption or in the source. Then the correction is made everywhere the same number appears: the check for contradictions between pages is part of the process rather than something done occasionally.

What counts as an error

A number that cannot be repeated
If the formula in the text gives a different result from the widget, that is an error, even if both look plausible.
A claim with no source
A firm's rule with no reference and no date, an estimate with no author. Even if correct in substance, it breaks the rule of verifiability.
A divergence between pages
One and the same value on two pages has to match. A divergence means one of them is out of date.

Frequently asked questions

Why are there no promises of returns on the site?

Because income depends on your statistics and your size, not on prop trading as a model. Any promise would be a claim about something we do not know.

Why do you not write rankings?

The order in public prop firm rankings usually reflects affiliate arrangements rather than quality. And compatibility of the limits with a strategy is personal: there is no single “best” here.

How do you handle disputed claims?

We give both sides with their authors named. The My Forex Funds case — the CFTC suit and its dismissal with costs awarded against the CFTC itself. The claim that “forex props do not exist” — with attribution and a check against the facts.

Do you give legal advice?

No, nor tax advice. On the relevant pages we lay out what the question consists of and what to clarify with a professional, but responsibility for the decision stays with the reader.

What should I do if I find an error in a calculation?

Write to us naming the page, the disputed number and the result you got yourself. We reproduce the error, find the cause and correct it everywhere the same number appears.

Do you correct old pages?

Yes, when firms' rules change or a divergence comes to light. The date checked is in the editorial signature — that is what to look at when judging how current something is.

Why are model examples marked separately?

So that the reader can tell “this is how it is at a particular firm” from “this is how it is in our illustration”. Confusing those two is the most common error in texts about prop trading.

Do you publish material from firms?

No. Press releases, guest articles and reviews commissioned by firms are not placed on the site. If that ever changes, a mark will appear both in the policy and in the material itself.

How do you decide that a number is out of date?

By the date checked and by the source itself: firms' rules change without notice, which is why the date stands next to the number. We always advise the reader to verify the terms in the rules on the date they apply.

May I suggest a topic?

Yes, through contacts. We choose topics by the questions people actually ask, so a suggestion phrased as a real question is more useful than the name of a topic.

DiagramThe four prohibitions of the editorial policy
What is absent from the site under the editorial policy: promises of returns and firm rankings, third-party statistics with no source, legal and tax advice
PPTF logo
The PPTF editorial teamWe take prop trading where it is actually calculated: the lot allowed by the daily and maximum limits, the payback of the fee, the payout after the split. Rules come from firms' documents, not from their advertising.Who writes this and how we verify dataData verified: 02.09.2026